Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Philip Primeau's avatar

Excellent point regarding the "Jewishness" of the liturgy. It's curious. The liturgical reformers in many respects wanted the liturgy to be more "Jewish" -- but, ultimately, what they produced is less "Jewish," crudely transplanted table blessings notwithstanding. One need look no further than the feast of the first day of the (civil) year, as it appears in the two dispensations. But the same reality is evident all over the place. One sees a direct line between "Temple" and "Church" at the TLM; at the NO, there is barely a line between "Synagogue" and "Church."

Expand full comment
Robert Keim's avatar

"It simply 𝘪𝘴 the worship of the divinely-revealed Hebrew religion transposed into a universal messianic key, and therefore appropriately enriched with Greco-Roman and Franco-Germanic elements"—what a superb summation of the thoroughly biblical, transhistorical, transcultural, all-encompassing spiritual-artistic glory of the traditional liturgical rites of western Christendom. If only the 1960s "reformers" had realized that in attempting to greatly improve upon these rites, they were attempting something that was—especially for modern man—utterly impossible.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts