I read it a while ago when it first came out. It's full of half-truths and lack of understanding. The finesse of a sledgehammer. There are a few criticisms of individual figures or books that I would agree with, of course.
I read it a while ago when it first came out. It's full of half-truths and lack of understanding. The finesse of a sledgehammer. There are a few criticisms of individual figures or books that I would agree with, of course.
This isn't a convincing rebuttal to a layman. Reading McFadden's article, the impression one gets is that occultism, or at best dangerous tolerance for occultism, is flourishing at the heart of the traditionalist Catholic intellectual world.
These accusations are serious, completely discrediting if true. If they're false, they deserve a serious response.
I read it a while ago when it first came out. It's full of half-truths and lack of understanding. The finesse of a sledgehammer. There are a few criticisms of individual figures or books that I would agree with, of course.
This isn't a convincing rebuttal to a layman. Reading McFadden's article, the impression one gets is that occultism, or at best dangerous tolerance for occultism, is flourishing at the heart of the traditionalist Catholic intellectual world.
These accusations are serious, completely discrediting if true. If they're false, they deserve a serious response.
Would make a worthwhile podcast discussion to help us hammerheads out!