I haven't been following the reactions of Protestants to the coronation, but certainly it comes as no surprise that the Anglican church is not, and could never be considered to be, a "sola scriptura" church. After all, the High Church side of things is heavily indebted to patristics and medieval tradition. That is why Newman was able to …
I haven't been following the reactions of Protestants to the coronation, but certainly it comes as no surprise that the Anglican church is not, and could never be considered to be, a "sola scriptura" church. After all, the High Church side of things is heavily indebted to patristics and medieval tradition. That is why Newman was able to emerge out of it into the full light of (Tridentine, i.e., fully developed) Catholicism.
Another topic: all over the internet, Protestants comment using "Yashua" instead of Jesus. It's hugely popular. Do you have time to explain whether this is Judaised Christianity? As briefly mentioned by Nesta Webster in her 1923 book, "World Revolution: the Plot Against Civilization," I'm currently reading. God bless you!
I haven't been following the reactions of Protestants to the coronation, but certainly it comes as no surprise that the Anglican church is not, and could never be considered to be, a "sola scriptura" church. After all, the High Church side of things is heavily indebted to patristics and medieval tradition. That is why Newman was able to emerge out of it into the full light of (Tridentine, i.e., fully developed) Catholicism.
Thank you for informing me. It makes sense now.
Another topic: all over the internet, Protestants comment using "Yashua" instead of Jesus. It's hugely popular. Do you have time to explain whether this is Judaised Christianity? As briefly mentioned by Nesta Webster in her 1923 book, "World Revolution: the Plot Against Civilization," I'm currently reading. God bless you!